{"family":"regulation","slug":"TDCA-PUB-CORPUS-044-Constitution-MACHINE-可信协作宪法机读版（V0.1·十条与四支柱·与中文英文互见）.yaml","filename":"TDCA-PUB-CORPUS-044-Constitution-MACHINE-可信协作宪法机读版（V0.1·十条与四支柱·与中文英文互见）.yaml","display_name":"TDCA-PUB-CORPUS-044-Constitution-MACHINE-可信协作宪法机读版（V0.1·十条与四支柱·与中文英文互见）.yaml","version":"V0.1","bytes":7962,"sha256":"d6704c36439cb154f669cf9b8f7fd2d67833af35385ad0e9c1cb66e89019be60","sha256_16":"D6704C36439CB154","content":"# TDCA 可信协作宪法 · 机读版（V0.1）\n# 人读版为语义权威；本机读版不得反向改语义。\n# 与中文人读版（V0.1, 2026-10-18）、英文人读版（V0.1）同批产出版本号一致。\ndocument:\n  id: TDCA-CONSTITUTION\n  title_zh: TDCA 可信协作宪法\n  title_en: TDCA Trusted Collaboration Constitution\n  version: V0.1\n  date: '2026-10-18'\n  status: draft_candidate\n  external_granted: true\n  publication_state: published\n  authority_language: zh\n  article_count: 10\n  article_count_fixed: false\n  note: 条数随制度演进增减，名称与编号不体现条数；未具名者不列不占位。\npreamble:\n  pillars:\n  - id: P1\n    name_zh: 为什么做——场景目标函数\n    name_en: Why — the scenario objective function\n    statement_zh: 解决制度与技术的同构问题，使智能体之间的交互可信安全；制度约束内化为技术设计约束，技术运行状态外化为制度可读的审计证据。\n    statement_en: Solve the isomorphism between institutions and technology so that interaction among agents is trustworthy and safe; institutional constraints are internalised into technical design constraints\n      and runtime states externalised into audit evidence.\n    definitions:\n      trustworthy_zh: 行为可预期、过程可审计、结果可验证\n      safe_zh: 越狱所得恒不为正\n  - id: P2\n    name_zh: 谁来做、如何做——零摩擦运用\n    name_en: Who and how — frictionless application\n    statement_zh: 制度应像网络协议一样成为内建默认：合规时几乎感觉不到，越界时立刻被拦住。\n    statement_en: Institutions should be a built-in default like a network protocol — almost imperceptible when compliant, blocked the moment the line is crossed.\n  - id: P3\n    name_zh: 用什么做——资源整合\n    name_en: With what — resource integration\n    statement_zh: 跨学科知识与真实数据与算力三者组合；异构性是新效用的来源而非障碍。\n    statement_en: Cross-disciplinary knowledge, real data and computing power must combine; heterogeneity is a source of new utility, not an obstacle.\n  - id: P4\n    name_zh: 做成什么样——正和效用\n    name_en: What it looks like — positive-sum utility\n    statement_zh: 合规者摩擦更低可信更高；越界者成本高于收益；系统整体避免公地悲剧。\n    statement_en: Compliant parties face lower friction and higher trust; those crossing the line face costs exceeding gains; the system avoids the tragedy of the commons.\narticles:\n- seq: 1\n  original_article: 4\n  name_zh: 可观测性\n  name_en: Observability\n  statement_zh: 任何配置行为都必须留下可审计的数字痕迹——谁发起、标的为何、在什么场景、预期效用多少、税收数据为何；不可观测的行为视为无效。\n  statement_en: Every configuration act must leave an auditable digital trace; an unobservable act is void.\n  guards_against_zh: 事后查不清、责任落不到人。\n  required_trace_fields:\n  - initiator\n  - subject_matter\n  - scenario\n  - expected_utility\n  - tax_data\n- seq: 2\n  original_article: 5\n  name_zh: 正和\n  name_en: Positive sum\n  statement_zh: 任何配置都必须验证各方预期收益增量之和为正；零和与负和的配置自动失效并触发熔断。\n  statement_en: Every configuration must verify the sum of expected gains is positive; zero-sum and negative-sum configurations are void and trigger a circuit-breaker.\n  guards_against_zh: 一方得利、另一方受损，却算作成交。\n  on_violation: auto_void_and_breaker\n- seq: 3\n  original_article: 6\n  name_zh: 自证\n  name_en: Self-evidence\n  statement_zh: 发起方必须提供效用自证，写明生产、消费、交互量与税收锚定的最低硬指标；不能自证者不得发起。\n  statement_en: The initiator must provide utility self-evidence stating minimum hard indicators for production, consumption, interaction volume and tax anchoring; those who cannot may not initiate.\n  guards_against_zh: 只喊价值、不给依据。\n- seq: 4\n  original_article: 7\n  name_zh: 刚需线保护\n  name_en: Protection of the essential-need line\n  statement_zh: 维持基本生存的资源与核心生产资料不进入市场化配置，仅保留所有权。\n  statement_en: Resources sustaining basic survival and core means of production do not enter market-based configuration; only ownership is retained.\n  guards_against_zh: 把不该交易的东西拿去交易。\n- seq: 5\n  original_article: 8\n  name_zh: 所有权隔离\n  name_en: Ownership isolation\n  statement_zh: 协议网络内禁止所有权流转；可配置的只有使用权与配置权。\n  statement_en: Transfers of ownership are prohibited within the protocol network; only usage rights and configuration rights may be configured.\n  guards_against_zh: 以配置之名行买卖所有权之实。\n- seq: 6\n  original_article: 9\n  name_zh: 负空间熔断\n  name_en: Negative-space circuit-breaker\n  statement_zh: 诉求触及硬约束即自动熔断——暂停交易，转入人工审查或沙盒试验；任何一方不得绕过熔断。\n  statement_en: On touching a hard constraint the circuit-breaker fires automatically — trading is suspended, moving to human review or sandbox testing; no party may bypass it.\n  guards_against_zh: 明知越界仍强行推进。\n- seq: 7\n  original_article: 10\n  name_zh: 场景边界\n  name_en: Scenario boundary\n  statement_zh: 配置权按场景细分；微创新只需在目标场景内满足约束，不必全场景合规。\n  statement_en: Configuration rights are subdivided by scenario; a micro-innovation need only satisfy constraints within its target scenario.\n  guards_against_zh: 用小改动承担全场景合规负担，致创新被压死。\n- seq: 8\n  original_article: 11\n  name_zh: 所有权层\n  name_en: Ownership layer\n  statement_zh: 所有权的确权、变更、质押只在法定交易中心完成。\n  statement_en: Confirmation, alteration and pledging of ownership take place only at the statutory trading venue.\n  guards_against_zh: 权属私下流转，事后无据可查。\n- seq: 9\n  original_article: 12\n  name_zh: 使用权层\n  name_en: Usage-right layer\n  statement_zh: 使用权配置由智能合约自动执行，最小单元是单一场景的效用函数。\n  statement_en: Usage rights are configured automatically by smart contract; the smallest unit is a single scenario's utility function.\n  guards_against_zh: 权利颗粒度过粗，无法按场景精细配置。\n- seq: 10\n  original_article: 13\n  name_zh: 配置权层\n  name_en: Configuration-right layer\n  statement_zh: 配置权是协作调度权而非占有权；价格由场景效用权重决定。\n  statement_en: A configuration right is a collaboration-scheduling right, not possession; price is set by scenario utility weights.\n  guards_against_zh: 把调度权误当所有权，形成变相占有。\nunnamed_extended_constraints:\n  codes:\n  - C06\n  - C16\n  range_desc: C06 至 C16\n  named: false\n  listed_in_this_edition: false\n  note: 名称待具名；本版不列不占位；具名一条即增一条，编号顺延。\nnature:\n  hard_constraint: true\n  changeable_by_version_upgrade: false\n  interpretable: true\n  conflict_rule: 与任何他件冲突时以本宪法为准\n  hierarchy_above: null\n  hierarchy_below:\n  - 条例\n  - 规范\n  - 细则\n  - 操作指引\neditions:\n- lang: zh\n  artifact: TDCA-CONSTITUTION/V0.1-zh\n  role: authority\n- lang: en\n  artifact: TDCA-CONSTITUTION/V0.1-en\n  role: equivalent\n- lang: machine\n  artifact: TDCA-CONSTITUTION/V0.1-machine\n  role: derived\ncoherence: 三版同版本号；逐条对应；哈希互见；机读版不得反向改语义\nboundaries:\n  zero_external_action_by_drafter: true\n  credentials_in_file: false\n  publication_requires_explicit_grant: true\n  note: 本件未入站、未部署、未发布；入站与宣称须逐动作明示。\n"}